Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Quality of Life Research ; 31(Supplement 2):S69, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2175129

ABSTRACT

Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic forced a trade-off between the interests of all versus those of individuals. Therefore, many healthcare organisations applied visiting restrictions, also for dying patients.Our aim was to explore, in an international context, if visiting restrictions for dying patients had an impact on the quality of life of healthcare professionals. Method(s): From April 2020 to June 2021, an open online survey was conducted among healthcare professionals in 14 countries;Belgium, Czech Republic, Norway, Slovenia, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Uruguay, Indonesia and Japan. The survey consisted of validated and purposively designed measures of perceived quality of care (CODE) and staff QoL. Data were analysed descriptively and inferentially, with regression analysis conducted for all countries, and the results pooled and analysed in a multilevel analysis using Cochrane Review Manager. Result(s): Among 2925 respondents (mean age 42 years), 2385 (81.8%) were female, 1601 (54.9%) were nursing staff, and 1560 (53.3%) worked in hospitals. Approximately half of the patients reported on were men (n = 1470, 50.4%) and 1202 (41.4%) were COVID-19 positive. In all countries, the majority of respondents rated medical and nursing care for the patient as sufficient (n = 2468, 84.6%, and n = 2426, 83.2%, respectively). In 1559 cases (53.9%), visitors were allowed with limitations during the last 2 days of the patient's life, and in 468 cases (16.2%) no visits were allowed at all. Most respondents rated their QoL during the past week as 4 or higher out of 7. Mean QoL was lowest in Brazil (M 3.94, SD 1.34) and highest in Indonesia (M 5.80, SD 1.21). Regression analyses showed that no or limited visiting in the last days of life, was associated with lower QoL scores of healthcare professionals compared with those who reported that visiting was unrestricted (OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.48-0.83, p<0.001). Heterogeneity between countries was high. Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that visiting restrictions are associated with QoL of healthcare professionals. It may be that restrictions resulted in staff feeling unable to provide the desired level of care, and in turn affected their role perception and QoL.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL